Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

GORDON v. LEWISTOWN HOSPITAL

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.
Jul 11, 2003
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
ORDER

SYLVIA RAMBO, Senior District Judge

In accordance with the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) The following exhibits are admitted into the record: Def. Exs. 226(A) (6 and 7), (15-18), (33), (35), (45), (50), (52), 226(I), (J)(1), 227(A)(1), (6-20), (E), (H), (I), (J) (3 and 5), and 231 (2, 10, 21, 29, and 40).

(2) The following exhibits are INADMISSIBLE and should be excluded from the record: Def. Exs. 226(A) (20 and 25), 226(J)(2-5), 231(19), (24), (28), (34), (37), (38), and (39);

(3) The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff on Counts I, II, and III of Plaintiffs' amended complaint;

(4) The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment as indicated by the court in its orders of May 21, 2001 — granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Counts I, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII — and August 15, 2001 — granting Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration as to Count I;

(5) Defendant's motion to strike Plaintiffs' proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law is DENIED AS MOOT;

(6) Defendant's motion to strike Plaintiffs' supplemental proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law is DENIED AS MOOT;

(7) The court will not entertain a motion for a new trial and will deny any such request sua sponte. If either party disagrees with any of the court's findings of fact or conclusions of law, they should seek relief from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; and

(8) The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case file.