COLARUSSO v. ROBERT

WILLIAM HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge

The Opinion of this Panel issued on July 16, 2003, is hereby amended as follows: In the second sentence of the third paragraph of page nineteen of the Opinion, the words "the Debtor's sole argument" shall be replaced with the words "Ragosa's sole argument", so that the sentence shall read as follows:

In reaching its conclusion, the bankruptcy court first noted that Ragosa's sole argument in favor of abstention was that the bankruptcy court did not have jurisdiction over this matter. Colarusso, 280 B.R. at 555.