Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

REILLY v. JAMES A. DEVER SCHOOL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Aug 18, 2003
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when she tripped over a water sprinkler head in the grass on the lawn at the Wheeler Avenue School in Valley Stream. The Supreme Court improperly denied summary judgment to the defendant Valley Stream Union Free School District Thirteen, s/h/a Valley Stream Union Free School District # 13 (hereinafter the defendant). The plaintiff's testimony, the photographs which she identified as accurately depicting the sprinkler head over which she tripped, and the place and circumstances of the alleged injury, established that the sprinkler head "did not constitute a trap or nuisance and was too trivial to be actionable as a matter of law" (Rametta v. County of Nassau, 296 A.D.2d 485, 486; see Trincere v. County of Suffolk, 90 N.Y.2d 976; Hymanson v. A.L.L. Assoc., 300 A.D.2d 358, 359; Dynov v. 16th Ave. Realty Assoc., 292 A.D.2d 335; Neumann v. Senior Citizens Ctr., 273 A.D.2d 452). In opposition to the defendant's prima facie case for summary judgment, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the defendant was entitled to summary judgment (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320).

SANTUCCI, J.P., McGINITY, TOWNES and MASTRO, JJ., concur.