- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
MATTER OF HAAS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
Sep 19, 2003
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Per Curiam.
Because we conclude that respondent has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law, we deny his application for reinstatement ( see 22 NYCRR 806.12[b]).
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that respondent's application for reinstatement is denied.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.