Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

RUSSELL v. STATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 8, 2003

PER CURIAM.

We affirm based on the authority of Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; Montgomery v. State, 821 So.2d 464 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), review granted, 837 So.2d 410 (Fla. 2003); andHill v. State, 805 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA), review dismissed, 817 So.2d 847 (Fla. 2002). We certify conflict with Negron v. State, 799 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); State v. Freeman, 775 So.2d 344 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), review denied, 790 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 2001); and Batchelor v. State, 729 So.2d 956 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF.