- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. WELLS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Nov 24, 2003
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel ( see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 712). In evaluating claims of ineffective assistance, the defense counsel's efforts should not be second-guessed with hindsight ( see People v. Benevento, supra; People v. Satterfield, 66 N.Y.2d 796, 799). Furthermore, "a reviewing court must avoid confusing true ineffectiveness with mere losing tactics" ( People v. Benevento, supra at 712; see People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 146).
The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit.
FLORIO, J.P., FRIEDMANN, H. MILLER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.