- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. KIM
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Dec 29, 2003
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, her arrest did not violate the rule of Payton v. New York ( 445 U.S. 573), as the evidence established that her arrest was not effected in her home.
The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not require reversal, as any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt ( see People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230; People v. Myers, 305 A.D.2d 429, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 597).
RITTER, J.P., FLORIO, FRIEDMANN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.