PEOPLE v. ANGELO

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant's claim that the County Court erred in designating him a level three sex offender is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not object to the designation on the grounds he now raises ( see People v. Baker, 303 A.D.2d 570). In any event, his contentions are without merit as the order was supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see Correction Law § 168-n).

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, ADAMS and COZIER, JJ., concur.