SEAVEY v. JAMES KENDRICK TRUCKING

Granite State's obligation to defend or indemnify did not extend to plaintiffs, who, it is now uncontroverted, were not named as insureds or additional insureds under the Granite State workers' compensation and employer's liability policy ( see Sanabria v. Am. Home Assur. Co., 68 N.Y.2d 866; National Gen. Ins. Co. v. The Hartford Acc. Indem. Co., 196 A.D.2d 414). Plaintiffs never pleaded or argued that they were judgment creditors entitled to seek enforcement of Granite State's obligation to defendant Kendrick Trucking pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420(b)(2). As such, their claims were unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to review them.

The order granting Granite State summary relief in this declaratory judgment action became res judicata and could not be circumvented by a subsequent effort to amend the complaint ( see Buckley Co. v. City of New York, 121 A.D.2d 933, 935, lv dismissed 69 N.Y.2d 742). Furthermore, plaintiffs' current judgment creditor claims, which arose out of the very same transactions and occurrences at issue in the third-party indemnification portion of the underlying personal injury action, could have been raised in that earlier litigation ( see Marinelli Assoc. v. Helmsley-Noyes Co., 265 A.D.2d 1).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.