Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

BLATTENBERGER v. CITY OF BUFFALO

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Feb 11, 2004
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for personal injuries he sustained when a vehicle driven by defendant Maurice T. Ridgeway struck a vehicle driven by Clarence A. Wansart, Jr. (decedent) and then struck plaintiff. Supreme Court properly denied the motion of Marion L. Wansart, as administratrix of decedent's estate (defendant), for summary judgment on liability. Defendant met her initial burden by establishing that Ridgeway's vehicle "suddenly entered the lane where [decedent] was operating [his vehicle] in a lawful and prudent manner and that there was nothing [decedent] could have done to avoid the collision" ( Pilarski v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 269 A.D.2d 821, 822; see Fratangelo v. Benson, 294 A.D.2d 880, 881; Behr v. Graham, 292 A.D.2d 788). Plaintiff, however, submitted photographs of the accident scene and the deposition testimony of the passenger in decedent's vehicle and thereby raised an issue of fact whether decedent had sufficient time and space to take evasive action and thus avoid the collision with Ridgeway's vehicle ( see Khaitov v. Minevich, 277 A.D.2d 805, 806; see also Palmer v. Rouse, 232 A.D.2d 909, 912).