Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. VATANSEVER

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Mar 1, 2004
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of his right to a public trial is not preserved for appellate review ( see People v. Casper, 287 A.D.2d 575; People v. Torres, 257 A.D.2d 639), and we decline to address it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see CPL 470.05).

The defendant's remaining contentions in his supplemental pro se brief are without merit.

RITTER, J.P., SMITH, H. MILLER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.