Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. RICE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Mar 19, 2004
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a guilty plea of two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law ยง 220.16, [12]) arising from his possession of more than one-half ounce of cocaine with the intent to sell it. Defendant contends that, because both counts involve the same cocaine, this Court should modify the judgment as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by reversing that part convicting him of one of the two counts. We decline to do so, inasmuch as the two counts are separate crimes ( see People v. Campbell, 175 A.D.2d 612, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 1074; see also People v. Thomas, 174 A.D.2d 994, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 1012, 1015). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.