PEOPLE v. STOKES

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court's determination designating him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and therefore, should be not disturbed ( see Correction Law § 168-n; People v. Cureton, 299 A.D.2d 532; People v. Bottisti, 285 A.D.2d 841).

SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, KRAUSMAN and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.