Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

OUGOURLIAN v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH HOSPITALS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Mar 22, 2004
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, the motion is granted, the complaint is reinstated, and a new trial is granted, with costs to abide the event.

The plaintiffs were denied a fair trial in this medical malpractice action by virtue of the cumulative effect of the improper conduct of the trial court, before testimony began, during the plaintiffs' direct case, cross-examination of the defense witness, and after the close of the evidence. As a result of such conduct, the jury could not have considered the issues at trial in a fair, calm, and unprejudiced manner ( see Perkins v. New York Racing Assn., 51 A.D.2d 585, 586; Habenicht v. R.K.O. Theatres, 23 A.D.2d 378; Livant v. Adams, 17 A.D.2d 784). Under the circumstances, the plaintiffs were not afforded a fair trial. Accordingly, a new trial is warranted. In addition, we note that the trial court should have given a circumstantial evidence charge.

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions either are without merit or have been rendered academic in light of our determination.

SMITH, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, MASTRO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.