Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. SANTANA

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Mar 29, 2004
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Although a particular comment that the prosecutor made during her opening statement was improper ( see People v. Brosnan, 32 N.Y.2d 254; People v. Kennedy, 216 A.D.2d 491), any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt ( see People v. Brosnan, supra at 262). In addition, although the testimony of one of the prosecution witnesses constituted improper bolstering ( see People v. Trowbridge, 305 N.Y. 471), the error was harmless because the accuracy of the bolstered identification was not contested ( see People v. Johnson, 57 N.Y.2d 969; People v. James, 262 A.D.2d 139).

The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, H. MILLER and COZIER, JJ., concur.