ATSI COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. THE SHAAR FUND, LTD., (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

LEWIS KAPLAN, District Judge

The motion of certain defendants for sanctions is denied without prejudice to renewal at the conclusion of the litigation. See Schlaifer Nance Co., Inc. v. Estate of Warhol, 194 F.3d 323, 333 (2d Cir. 1999) (district court has jurisdiction to determine a motion for sanctions after close of underlying case).

SO ORDERED.

It is ORDERED that counsel to whom this Order is sent is responsible for faxing a copy to all counsel and retaining verification of such in the case file. Do not fax such verification to Chambers.