JOHNSON v. FULTON CONCRETE COMPANY

MARVIN SHOOB, Senior District Judge

This matter is before the Court on defendant's motion for summary judgment and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (RR) recommending that Court grant the motion as to plaintiffs federal law claims and dismiss plaintiff's (state law claims. Although plaintiff filed a document labeled "objections," plaintiff (does not explain how the RR is incorrect. Rather, plaintiff criticizes the Judge's previous orders granting plaintiffs attorneys' motions to withdraw and explains how an injury to his large toe prevented him from testifying truthfully during his deposition. Plaintiff urges the Court to deny defendant's motion for summary judgment because dismissal will deny plaintiff "justice and his day in court."

After a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that plaintiff's objections are without merit, concludes that the RR is correct, ADOPTS the RR [#101-1], GRANTS defendant's motion for summary judgment as to plaintiffs federal claims [#77-1], DISMISSES without prejudice plaintiff's state law claims, and DISMISSES this action [#1-1].

IT IS SO ORDERED.