Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

IN THE MATTER OF GRUNKORN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
Apr 15, 2004
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

By decision of an Administrative Law Judge dated and mailed October 23, 2002, claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment due to misconduct. By letter postmarked June 2, 2003, claimant appealed the decision to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. Although he testified that he received the Administrative Law Judge's decision, claimant offered no valid excuse for his failure to comply with the 20-day statutory period set forth in Labor Law ยง 621 (1). Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision dismissing the appeal as untimely ( see Matter of Esposito [Commissioner of Labor], 2 A.D.3d 1036; Matter of Del Valle [Commissioner of Labor], 285 A.D.2d 888). Claimant's arguments relating to the underlying merits of the denial of his application for unemployment insurance benefits are, therefore, not properly before this Court ( see id.).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.