- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
DRAKEFORD v. CITY OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Apr 22, 2004
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Legal claims against the Kings County District Attorney for tortious conduct are properly lodged against the City of New York ( see Morris v. City of New York, 198 A.D.2d 35, 36). However, this record is devoid of any factual circumstances supporting plaintiff's rambling and conclusory allegations of tortious, extra-judicial conduct. The complaint of malicious prosecution is precluded by the District Attorney's entitlement to absolute immunity from civil claims arising out of the scope of a prosecution ( Hirschfeld v. City of New York, 253 A.D.2d 53, 59, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 814).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.