Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

LIFSHITZ v. BETH ISRAEL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
May 24, 2004
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, the motion of the defendant August A. Feola is granted, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against him; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as cross-appealed from; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants August A. Feola, Angelo R. Rubano, and Martin Rosen, payable by the plaintiffs.

In support of their separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, the defendants August A. Feola, Angelo R. Rubano, and Martin Rosen (hereinafter the defendants) made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see O'Shaughnessy v. Hines, 248 A.D.2d 687, 688). The burden then shifted to the plaintiffs to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact by submitting an expert's affidavit attesting to a departure from accepted practice and containing an opinion that the defendants' acts or omissions were a competent producing cause of the death of Aaron Lifshitz ( see Domaradzki v. Glen Cove OB/GYN Assocs., 242 A.D.2d 282). The conclusory affidavit of the plaintiffs' medical expert failed to demonstrate that the alleged departure of the defendants was the proximate cause of the death. This was insufficient to defeat summary judgment ( see Kaplan v. Hamilton Med. Assocs., 262 A.D.2d 609).

SMITH, J.P., S. MILLER, CRANE and RIVERA, JJ., concur.