- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
KIMAN v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Kiman v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections et al., No. 03-7364 (May 24, 2004)
Factual and Procedural Background
This opinion concerns a petition for certiorari from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case titled KIMAN v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL. The motion of the petitioner to proceed in forma pauperis was granted. The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the judgment of the court of appeals, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Tennessee v. Lane (referenced as "ante, p. 509"). The opinion reports the lower-court decision at 332 F.3d 29.
Legal Issues Presented
The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.
Arguments of the Parties
The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.
Table of Precedents Cited
| Precedent | Rule or Principle Cited For | Application by the Court |
|---|---|---|
| Tennessee v. Lane (referenced as "ante, p. 509") | Not specified in the provided opinion; cited as the authority prompting further consideration. | The Supreme Court vacated the judgment below and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Tennessee v. Lane. |
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The opinion is a brief dispositive order and contains no extended legal analysis. The actions taken by the Court are stated succinctly: the petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis was granted; certiorari was granted; the judgment of the Court of Appeals was vacated; and the case was remanded to the lower court for further consideration in light of Tennessee v. Lane. No additional reasoning, factual findings, or statutory interpretations are provided in the text of the opinion.
Holding and Implications
CERTIORARI GRANTED; JUDGMENT VACATED; REMANDED FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION IN LIGHT OF TENNESSEE v. LANE.
Direct consequences: The First Circuit's judgment has been vacated and the case has been sent back to the court of appeals for additional consideration taking Tennessee v. Lane into account. The opinion itself does not set out or announce a new, broad legal precedent; it directs further proceedings rather than resolving substantive legal questions on the merits.
C.A. 1st Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Tennessee v. Lane, ante, p. 509. Reported below: 332 F. 3d 29.
Alert