Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. LUKE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Jun 29, 2004
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

The court properly admitted the testifying victim's statement to a social worker as an excited utterance ( see People v. Johnson, 1 N.Y.3d 302). The evidence established that the distraught victim, described by a witness as hysterical, was still under the stress of the brutal beating that defendant had inflicted a short time before.

The court properly refused to submit assault in the third degree as a lesser included offense of assault in the second degree. Given the nature of the victim's injuries, as well as fact that her testimony constituted an integrated whole ( see People v. Negron, 91 N.Y.2d 788), there was no reasonable view of the evidence that defendant assaulted the victim with just his hands rather than with a dangerous instrument.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.