ROBINSON v. HARTZELL PROPELLER INC

JAN DuBOIS, District Judge

AND NOW, this 21^st day of July, 2004, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (Document No. 67, filed September 10, 2003), Defendant Hartzell Propeller Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (Document No. 68, filed September 24, 2003), and Plaintiffs' Reply to Hartzell's Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (Document No. 69, filed September 29, 2003), it appearing from the Motion that plaintiffs seek production of Engineering Report No. 159, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (Document No. 67) is GRANTED and defendant, Hartzell Propeller, Inc., shall produce Engineering Report No. 159 within ten (10) days of the date hereof. AND NOW, this 21^st day of July, 2004, upon consideration of Defendant Hartzell Propeller, Inc.'s Motion to Amend Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint By Adding a Counterclaim (Document No. 36, filed April 9, 2003), Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to Defendant Hartzell Propeller Inc's Motion to Amend Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint By Adding a Counterclaim (Document No. 42, filed April 23, 2003), and Reply of Defendant Hartzell Propeller Inc. to Plaintiffs' Response to Hartzell's Motion to File an Amended Answer (Document No. 46, filed May 8, 2003), IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Hartzell Propeller, Inc.'s Motion to Amend Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint By Adding a Counterclaim (Document No. 36) is GRANTED. Defendant, Hartzell Propeller, Inc., shall file and serve its Amended Answer and Counterclaim within ten (10) days of the date hereof. Plaintiffs shall file and serve their response to the Amended Answer and Counterclaim within ten (10) days of service of a copy of same. One (1) copy of each document shall be served on the Court (Chambers, Room 12613) when the original is filed.