PEOPLE v. STRICKLAND

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt on all charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).

Any error in failing to suppress physical evidence seized from the defendant's automobile was, under the circumstances of this case, harmless beyond a reasonable doubt ( see People v. Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230; People v. Manino, 306 AD2d 541, 542).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).