- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MARBLE
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 1, 2004
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2004, upon consideration of the contention of respondent-attorney that he is suffering from a disabling condition which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to disciplinary charges brought against him in connection with Disciplinary Board Docket No. 29 DB 2004, it is hereby
ORDERED that David Granger Marble is immediately transferred to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E., for an indefinite period and until further Order of the Court. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings against the respondent-attorney shall meanwhile be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of testimony.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.