Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. ILLIS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 4, 2004

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly declined to dismiss the depraved indifference murder count ( see Penal Law ยง 125.25). Sufficient evidence was presented at trial to support the conclusion that the defendant acted recklessly and with depraved indifference to human life, rather than intentionally ( see People v. Sanchez, 98 NY2d 373; People v. Gallagher, 69 NY2d 525; People v. Register, 60 NY2d 270, 274, cert denied 466 US 953; cf. People v. Wall, 29 NY2d 863).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).

The defendant's trial counsel provided meaningful representation ( see People v. Benevento, 91 NY2d 708; People v. Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).