Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. BIASELLI

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Nov 19, 2004
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of sexual misconduct (Penal Law § 130.20) and two counts of endangering the welfare of a child (§ 260.10 [1]). The waiver of the right to appeal by defendant encompasses his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution ( see People v. McKay, 5 AD3d 1040, 1041, lv denied 2 NY3d 803). Further, defendant failed to preserve that challenge for review by moving to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction ( see People v. Casco, 4 AD3d 742). In any event, the record establishes that defendant's Alford plea ( see North Carolina v. Alford, 400 US 25) was properly accepted by County Court ( see People v. Sherman, 8 AD3d 1026, 1026-1027).