MARKOVITS v. MITRANY

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the parties' agreement to enter into a stipulation settling the actions did not deprive the court of further jurisdiction to supervise and enforce the terms of the agreement ( see Teitelbaum Holdings v. Gold, 48 NY2d 51, 53; Greyston Found. v. Nationwide Ins. Co., 288 AD2d 438; M B Equities v. Parkway Gardens Owners, 286 AD2d 755; Berrian v. McCombs, 280 AD2d 442). Further, the actions taken to enforce the terms of the settlement were proper.

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.