Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. SMITH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Nov 29, 2004

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not denied the effective assistance of counsel. Viewing the record as a whole, we conclude that the defendant received meaningful representation ( see People v. Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). The defense counsel presented a reasonable defense, interposed appropriate objections, and effectively cross-examined witnesses ( see People v. Wright, 8 AD3d 507, 508; People v. Washington, 5 AD3d 615). Unsuccessful trial strategies and tactics do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel ( see People v. Henry, 95 NY2d 563, 566).