IN THE MATTER OF CARLOS P

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the juvenile delinquency petition and supporting depositions contained sufficient nonhearsay allegations to establish, if true, his commission of the criminal acts alleged against him ( see Family Ct Act § 311.2; Matter of Alex B., 189 AD2d 813, 813-814).

The appellant's contention that his right to a speedy trial was violated is without merit ( see Family Ct Act § 340.1). Moreover, there is nothing in the record to indicate that the Family Court Judge was biased against the appellant ( see Matter of Nathan N., 56 AD2d 554).

The appellant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.