WILLIAMS v. STATE

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the lower court's denial of appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). As we recently held in Burgal v. State, No. 3D03-3016, 888 So.2d 702, 2004 WL 2601148 (Fla. 3d DCA Nov. 17, 2004), Blakely does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review.

Affirmed.