NUAMAH v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The denial of the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim was a provident exercise of discretion ( see General Municipal Law § 50-e; Matter of Hicks v. City of New York, 8 AD3d 566; Matter of Camilleri v. County of Suffolk, 190 AD2d 669).