IN RE OF ESTATE OF VAISMAN

The determination was supported by substantial evidence. The record, including inferences and assessments of credibility, provides ample evidence that petitioners failed to meet the requirements of primary residency and/or family relationship for the right to succeed to the Mitchell-Lama apartment in question, in accordance with rules governing the rental of space in city-aided limited profit housing companies (28 RCNY 3-02 [n] [4]; [p] [3]; Matter of Shupack v. Dayton Towers Corp., 203 AD2d 134).

We have considered petitioners' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.