- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. SANTILLI
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Mar 18, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18), defendant contends that the sentence of incarceration of 3½ years to life constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. We conclude that the contention of defendant does not survive her valid waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v. Hidalgo, 283 AD2d 154, lv denied 96 NY2d 902; People v. Brathwaite, 263 AD2d 89, 92) and, in any event, that contention is not preserved for our review ( see People v. Ingram, 67 NY2d 897, 899; People v. Cato, 291 AD2d 905, lv denied 98 NY2d 649).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.