Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

LARDNER v. UNITED STATE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

United States District Court, D. Columbia.
Mar 31, 2005
ORDER

JOHN BATES, District Judge

Upon consideration of [23] plaintiff's motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for a more adequate Vaughn index, [24] defendant's motion for summary judgment, and the entire record in this case, and for the reasons explained in the Memorandum Opinion issued on this date, it is this 31st day of March, 2005, hereby

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for a more adequate Vaughn index is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; it is further

ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is further

ORDERED that defendant shall disclose to plaintiff the names of unsuccessful pardon applicants to the extent they appear in requested documents, and the names of individuals who wrote letters in support of pardon applications or were listed as character references on pardon applications to the extent they appear in requested documents, except that defendant shall not be required to disclose to plaintiff any names that appear in documents or portions of documents that defendant has otherwise properly withheld under FOIA.