- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. ALEXANDER
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Apr 11, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove his guilt of murder in the second degree is not preserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v. Cona, 49 NY2d 26; People v. Soto, 8 AD3d 683). The defendant's contention that the court's Allen charge ( see Allen v. United States, 164 US 492) shifted the burden of proof from the prosecution is also not preserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Whetstone, 247 AD2d 414, 415; People v. Marinelli, 238 AD2d 525, 526). We decline to review these issues in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.