Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

SALAMI v. N.C. AGRICULTURAL TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina.
Apr 13, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
ORDER

JAMES BEATY, District Judge

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously herewith,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Document #42] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED and this claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendant's Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's claim of discrimination based on his national origin and religion, and on his claims of retaliation based on the deprivation of his research space, Plaintiff's claims of retaliation based on Defendant's failure to renovate his research space, the termination of the CIRI, Defendant's refusal to approve the PTIA Proposal, and Defendant's failure to provide Plaintiff with additional funds from the Caterpillar Proposal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendant's Motion to Strike [Document #65] a number of Plaintiff's supporting affidavits is DENIED. Additionally, Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Defendant's Expert Report [Document #40] is DENIED and Defendant's Motion to deem that same expert report timely filed [Document #38] is GRANTED.