Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

CLARK v. CLARK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Apr 18, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

The plaintiff commenced this action for a divorce and ancillary relief. When the case was called for trial on September 30, 2002, the plaintiff informed the Supreme Court that he could not go forward with the trial, and the Supreme Court dismissed the action. Bereck sought and was granted leave to apply for an award of an attorney's fee to be paid by the plaintiff. She then made a motion for an award of an attorney's fee in the sum of $9,150.68. Following a hearing, the Supreme Court issued an order granting the motion to the extent of awarding Bereck an attorney's fee in the sum of $3,000.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in awarding an attorney's fee in the sum of $3,000 ( see Domestic Relations Law ยง 237 [a]; Morrissey v. Morrissey, 259 AD2d 472; Rice v. Rice, 222 AD2d 493; Sadofsky v. Sadofsky, 78 AD2d 520).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions either are not properly before this Court or are without merit.