Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

BROWDER v. ANKROM

United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Owensboro.
Apr 25, 2005
ORDER

JOSEPH McKINLEY, District Judge

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion entered this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deprivation of medical treatment claim, his Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim, and his Fourteenth Amendment challenge to the per diem charges are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1); and

2. All individual capacity claims against the defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).