- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. GOMEZ
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
May 2, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not denied the effective assistance of counsel. Viewing the totality of the evidence, the law, and circumstances of the case, we conclude that the defendant received meaningful representation ( see People v. Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712). Unsuccessful trial strategies and mere losing tactics do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel ( see People v. Henry, 95 NY2d 563; People v. Benevento, supra). The defense counsel presented a vigorous defense and effectively cross-examined witnesses ( see People v. Wright, 8 AD3d 507).
The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.