IN THE MATTER OF ABELLARD v. AIME

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the Family Court properly considered the assistance he received from his father in calculating his child support obligation ( see Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [b] [5] [iv] [D]; Mellen v. Mellen, 260 AD2d 609, 609-610; Lapkin v. Lapkin, 208 AD2d 474) by imputing the loans the petitioner received from his father as income ( see Matter of Yaroshenko v. Kats, 7 AD3d 806).