- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
ZAPATA v. COLON
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jun 6, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
The plaintiff's motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, was, in actuality, one for reargument only. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from the denial of reargument ( see Pacella v. Whiteman Osterman Hanna, 14 AD3d 545; Amsler v. Verrilli, 203 AD2d 403).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.