PEOPLE v. SUTTON

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in determining that he is a level three risk under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). The record establishes that defendant engaged in a continuous course of sexual misconduct and did not complete treatment because of a disciplinary problem. Consequently, we conclude that the court's determination is supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see generally § 168-n [3]; People v. Barnwell, 6 AD3d 1146, 1147, lv denied 3 NY3d 604).