Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. HURST

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Jun 10, 2005

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Because attempted burglary in the second degree is a violent felony offense as a matter of law ( see Penal Law § 70.02 [c]; People v. Wroten, 286 AD2d 189, 198, lv denied 97 NY2d 610), we conclude that County Court's designation of defendant as a level two risk is supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see generally Correction Law § 168-n). Defendant's remaining contention is not preserved for our review ( see Oram v. Capone, 206 AD2d 839, 840) and, in any event, lacks merit.