Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

WORTH v. JACKSON

United States District Court, D. Columbia.
Jul 19, 2005
ORDER

REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge

Currently before the Court are (1) the defendants' Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment ("Defs.' Mot.") and their Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, and for Summary Judgment ("Defs.' Mem."); (2) the plaintiff's Statement of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint ("Pl.'s Opp'n"); and (3) the defendants' Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment ("Defs.' Reply"). For the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby this 19th day of July, 2005

ORDERED that the defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.