- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
IN THE MATTER OF OLIPHANT v. OLIPHANT
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Aug 1, 2005
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
A party attempting to vacate a default judgment must establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense ( see Zherka v. Zherka, 17 AD3d 668; Rolston v. Rolston, 261 AD2d 377). The father failed to satisfy that standard in this case.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.