MILLS v. STATE

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant's refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burchfield v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, C.J., WOLF and PADOVANO, concur.