- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
D'ARCO v. PAGANO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Sep 26, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs' contentions, the defendant satisfied her burden of showing that the marble saddle installed between the dining room and living room of her residence, which was raised 1 1/16 of an inch over the adjacent carpeted floor, was a trivial defect, and did not have the characteristics of a trap or snare ( see Trincere v. County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976; Nathan v. City of New Rochelle, 282 AD2d 585). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Morris v. Greenburgh Cent. School Dist. No. 7, 5 AD3d 567; Hargrove v. Baltic Estates, 278 AD2d 278).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.