- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
FAISAL v. MAYRONNE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 17, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
A jury verdict should not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached its verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence ( see Nicastro v. Park, 113 AD2d 129). Determinations of the credibility of the witnesses are for the finder of fact, which had the opportunity to see and hear the witnesses ( see Sideris v. Town of Huntington, 240 AD2d 652). The verdict in the favor of the defendant, Ronald Mayronne, is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.