- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
IN THE MATTER OF STERN v. GARFINKLE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 19, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly determined that it was without jurisdiction to hear the instant proceeding. Election Law § 16-106 gives the Supreme Court jurisdiction over "challenged" absentee ballots ( see Matter of Dorman v. Scaringe, 222 AD2d 887, 887-888; Matter of Gates v. Scaringe, 105 AD2d 543). The petitioner failed to demonstrate that he challenged the absentee ballots at issue in accordance with the provisions of the Election Law ( see Election Law §§ 8-502, 8-506; Matter of Gates v. Scaringe, supra; see generally Matter of Cosgrove v Jensen, 252 AD2d 555).
In view of the foregoing, we do not reach the parties' remaining contentions.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.